SKYDDA VÅRA GRUNDLAGSSKYDDADE FRI- & RÄTTIGHETER
Kommentarer
#20810
Jag är född fri och vill så förbli.Vill inte föstöra mitt immunsystem med vaccinationer.
Mitt immunsystem har fungerat både mot Asiaten och Hongkong samt Covid.
Lena Dickson (Svanesund, 2022-12-19)
#20816
OkMarianne Olovsdotter-Rye (Stockholm, 2023-01-05)
#20818
Ett av mina starkaste behov är frihet. En vågskål mellan frihet och ömsesidighet. Då jag är den som känner mina behov och kan tillgodose dem. Väljer då frihet.♥️😊Inga-Maj Johansson (Piteå, 2023-01-15)
#20820
Det är totalt vansinniga förslag!!!!!!Christine Sabel (Köpenhamn, 2023-01-30)
#20825
Det skall inte genomföras någon grundlagsändring i Sverige. Vi är rädda om de få friheter som finns kvar! Inga fler klåfingriga politiker tack!Ni kan bytas ut!!
Louise Andersson (Göteborg, 2023-03-13)
#20826
Våra mänskliga fri- och rättigheter eller våra grundlagar får inte röras!Vi har rätt till att röra oss fritt, mötesfrihet får inte röras, vi måste behålla vår demokrati!
Om Ni Rör vår grundlag har vi inte längre någon demokrati!
Marianne Liljeholt (Arboga, 2023-04-12)
#20827
Rör inte våran grundlag!Bengt Bergvall (Jörn, 2023-05-31)
#20828
Mänskliga rättigheter ska respekteras! Sveriges regering ska sluta bete sig som en diktatur.Anna Sundström (Enköping, 2023-06-15)
#20829
Alla har rätt att välja självaHelen Thomson (Tyresö, 2023-07-11)
#20830
Jag är emot en grundlagsändringHeike Bengtsson (Sollentuna, 2023-08-03)
#20835
Ändra inte våra grundlagar!Villy Rendal (Stenungsund, 2023-08-22)
#20841
Jag vill inte att grundlagen ändrasPer Dahlin (Södertälje, 2023-12-01)
#20844
I egenskap av läkare och försvarare av mänskliga rättigheter och humanitet finner jag det fullständigt hårresande och oacceptabelt att på så osäkra och minst sagt dubiösa grunder som förevarit under covid 19 perioden, i framtiden låta individen bli utsatt för dylika övergrepp, som det nya förslaget om undantagstillstånd med utegångsförbud etc. som regeringen avviserar.Rolf Stålhandske (Göteborg, 2023-12-09)
#20846
Dessa diktaturfasoner måste stoppas till varje pris Jag vill inte bo i Kina eller NordkoreaStefan Lundström (Hallsberg, 2024-07-25)
#20854
Frihet är inte förhandlingsbar!Robert Sjunnesson (Varberg, 2024-12-29)
#20855
Vår nuvarande "Regering" är ett dåligt skämt.De följer bara sina egna "regler". De måste vara mentalsjuka. Bort med dem, in med AFS OCH Knapptryckarna.
Anders Wiman (Malmö, 2024-12-31)
#20856
• Ritter et al., in 1975, found that 'the wearing of a surgical face mask had no effect upon the overall operating room environmental contamination.'• Ha’eri and Wiley, in 1980, applied human albumin microspheres to the interior of surgical masks in 20 operations. At the end of each operation, wound washings were examined under the microscope. 'Particle contamination of the wound was demonstrated in all experiments.'
• Laslett and Sabin, in 1989, found that caps and masks were not necessary during cardiac catheterization. 'No infections were found in any patient, regardless of whether a cap or mask was used,' they wrote. Sjøl and Kelbaek came to the same conclusion in 2002.
• In Tunevall’s 1991 study, a general surgical team wore no masks in half of their surgeries for two years. After 1,537 operations performed with masks, the wound infection rate was 4.7%, while after 1,551 operations performed without masks, the wound infection rate was only 3.5%.
• A review by Skinner and Sutton in 2001 concluded that 'The evidence for discontinuing the use of surgical face masks would appear to be stronger than the evidence available to support their continued use.'
• Lahme et al., in 2001, wrote that 'surgical face masks worn by patients during regional anaesthesia, did not reduce the concentration of airborne bacteria over the operation field in our study. Thus they are dispensable.'
• Figueiredo et al., in 2001, reported that in five years of doing peritoneal dialysis without masks, rates of peritonitis in their unit were no different than rates in hospitals where masks were worn.
• Morens DM, Taubenberger JK, Fauci AS. Predominant role of bacterial pneumonia as a cause of death in pandemic influenza: implications for pandemic influenza preparedness. J Infect Dis 2008 Oct;198 (published online Aug 18)
• Bahli did a systematic literature review in 2009 and found that 'no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative wound infection was observed between masks groups and groups operated with no masks.'
• Surgeons at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, recognizing the lack of evidence supporting the use of masks, ceased requiring them in 2010 for anesthesiologists and other non-scrubbed personnel in the operating room. 'Our decision to no longer require routine surgical masks for personnel not scrubbed for surgery is a departure from common practice. But the evidence to support this practice does not exist,' wrote Dr. Eva Sellden.
• Webster et al., in 2010, reported on obstetric, gynecological, general, orthopaedic, breast and urological surgeries performed on 827 patients. All non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries, and none of the non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries. Surgical site infections occurred in 11.5% of the Mask group, and in only 9.0% of the No Mask group.
• Lipp and Edwards reviewed the surgical literature in 2014 and found 'no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials.' Vincent and Edwards updated this review in 2016 and the conclusion was the same.
• Carøe, in a 2014 review based on four studies and 6,006 patients, wrote that 'none of the four studies found a difference in the number of post-operative infections whether you used a surgical mask or not.'
• Salassa and Swiontkowski, in 2014, investigated the necessity of scrubs, masks and head coverings in the operating room and concluded that 'there is no evidence that these measures reduce the prevalence of surgical site infection.'
• Da Zhou et al., reviewing the literature in 2015, concluded that 'there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that face masks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination.'
Så, de fungerar inte för något..
Vidare på mikro- och nanoplaster sciencedirect /science/article/pii/S0147651323013623
Roberto Hurtig (Skövde, 2025-04-24)